CANALES-ORDONEZ v. State

66 So. 3d 1035, 2011 WL 3425995

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 2011·No. 5D10-2101·Published

Opinion

66 So.3d 1035 (2011)

Franklin Armando CANALES-ORDONEZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-2101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 2, 2011.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Pate, 656 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

66 So.3d 1035 (2011)

Franklin Armando CANALES-ORDONEZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D10-2101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 2, 2011.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Pate, 656 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.

CANALES-ORDONEZ v. State, 66 So. 3d 1035, 2011 WL 3425995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

66 So. 3d 1035 (CANALES-ORDONEZ v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

656 So. 2d 1323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)