Canal Authority v. Callaway

Fifth Circuit

Canal Authority v. Callaway

512 F.2d 670, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 2, 1975

DocketNo. 74-2731

StatusPublished

This text of 512 F.2d 670 (Canal Authority v. Callaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canal Authority v. Callaway, 512 F.2d 670, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20 (5th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed.

More than a year has passed since final judgment was entered in this case, and in light of statements during oral argument by counsel for the several contesting parties in this protracted litigation that circumstances with respect to the operation of the “Rodman Pool” have changed, we are of the view that although the judgment denying an injunction against lowering the level of the pool should be affirmed, the case should be remanded to the trial court for the continued exercise of its equitable jurisdiction over the matter in question.

Affirmed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed.

More than a year has passed since final judgment was entered in this case, and in light of statements during oral argument by counsel for the several contesting parties in this protracted litigation that circumstances with respect to the operation of the “Rodman Pool” have changed, we are of the view that although the judgment denying an injunction against lowering the level of the pool should be affirmed, the case should be remanded to the trial court for the continued exercise of its equitable jurisdiction over the matter in question.

Affirmed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

512 F.2d 670, 5 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canal-authority-v-callaway-ca5-1975.