Canady v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Canady v. State

1912 OK CR 39, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 707, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 5, 1912

DocketNo. A-1126.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 39 (Canady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canady v. State, 1912 OK CR 39, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 707, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Red Canady, plaintiff in error, was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law. March 7th, 1911, he was sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of three hundred dollars. An appeal was taken by filing in this court on May 2nd, .1911, a petition in error with case-made. When the case was called for final submission on the assignment, the Attorney General moved in open court to affirm for failure to prosecute. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made in this court on plaintiff in error’s behalf. The appeal having been abandoned, the motion to affirm is hereby sustained. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Red Canady, plaintiff in error, was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law. March 7th, 1911, he was sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of three hundred dollars. An appeal was taken by filing in this court on May 2nd, .1911, a petition in error with case-made. When the case was called for final submission on the assignment, the Attorney General moved in open court to affirm for failure to prosecute. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made in this court on plaintiff in error’s behalf. The appeal having been abandoned, the motion to affirm is hereby sustained. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 39, 119 P. 1129, 6 Okla. Crim. 707, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canady-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.