Canady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Canady v. State

689 So. 2d 369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1200, 1997 WL 68044

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 1997·No. No. 95-05268·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Taurus Canady filed this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sen[370]*370tence, but remand for entry of a proper written order.

This court’s review of the record reflects that the trial court entered a defective sentencing order by failing to set forth the specific condition of community control that Ca-nady violated. Therefore, we remand the judgment and sentence with directions to the trial court to enter a corrected order. See Miles v. State, 590 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Taurus Canady filed this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sen[370]*370tence, but remand for entry of a proper written order.

This court’s review of the record reflects that the trial court entered a defective sentencing order by failing to set forth the specific condition of community control that Ca-nady violated. Therefore, we remand the judgment and sentence with directions to the trial court to enter a corrected order. See Miles v. State, 590 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Canady v. State, 689 So. 2d 369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1200, 1997 WL 68044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

689 So. 2d 369 (Canady v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related