Canady v. State
This text of 689 So. 2d 369 (Canady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Counsel for Taurus Canady filed this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sen[370]*370tence, but remand for entry of a proper written order.
This court’s review of the record reflects that the trial court entered a defective sentencing order by failing to set forth the specific condition of community control that Ca-nady violated. Therefore, we remand the judgment and sentence with directions to the trial court to enter a corrected order. See Miles v. State, 590 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
689 So. 2d 369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1200, 1997 WL 68044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canady-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.