Canady v. State

689 So. 2d 369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1200, 1997 WL 68044
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 1997
DocketNo. 95-05268
StatusPublished

This text of 689 So. 2d 369 (Canady v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canady v. State, 689 So. 2d 369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1200, 1997 WL 68044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Taurus Canady filed this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm the judgment and sen[370]*370tence, but remand for entry of a proper written order.

This court’s review of the record reflects that the trial court entered a defective sentencing order by failing to set forth the specific condition of community control that Ca-nady violated. Therefore, we remand the judgment and sentence with directions to the trial court to enter a corrected order. See Miles v. State, 590 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

PARKER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Miles v. State
590 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 So. 2d 369, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1200, 1997 WL 68044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canady-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.