Canady v. Mann
429 S.E.2d 348, 333 N.C. 569, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 183
Opinion
After consideration of the new briefs and oral arguments, the Court determines that defendants Brinn and Carolina Lakes Corporation’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed.
DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Canady v. Mann, 429 S.E.2d 348, 333 N.C. 569, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 183 (N.C. 1993).
429 S.E.2d 348 (Canady v. Mann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Howe v. Links Club Condo. Ass'n, Inc.
823 S.E.2d 439 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)
Boyd v. Drum
501 S.E.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1998)
Edwards v. West
495 S.E.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1998)
Computer Decisions, Inc. v. Rouse Office Management of North Carolina, Inc.
477 S.E.2d 262 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Garlock v. Henson
435 S.E.2d 114 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)