Canady v. Jackson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Canady v. Jackson

492 S.W.3d 668, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 659, 2016 WL 3538559

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2016

DocketWD 78236

StatusPublished

This text of 492 S.W.3d 668 (Canady v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canady v. Jackson, 492 S.W.3d 668, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 659, 2016 WL 3538559 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Shareece Jackson appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County which granted Myrtle Canady’s request for specific performance of a settlement agreement between Jackson and Canady. The settlement concerned Jackson’s claims arising out of an automobile accident. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Shareece Jackson appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County which granted Myrtle Canady’s request for specific performance of a settlement agreement between Jackson and Canady. The settlement concerned Jackson’s claims arising out of an automobile accident. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 S.W.3d 668, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 659, 2016 WL 3538559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canady-v-jackson-moctapp-2016.