Canady v. Collins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Canady v. Collins

134 S.E.2d 669, 261 N.C. 412, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 474

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 4, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 S.E.2d 669 (Canady v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Canady v. Collins, 134 S.E.2d 669, 261 N.C. 412, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 474 (N.C. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff on 11 May 1962. Plaintiff assigns as error the granting of defendant’s motion for nonsuit at the close of plaintiff's evidence.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff “prepared to cross” a street in the City of Wilmington, he observed defendant’s automobile approaching from his left and “was afraid to proceed across the street, he came to a complete stop,” and while “waiting to cross” was struck and injured by defendant’s car. Plaintiff’s evidence tends to show that he was crossing the street in the middle of a block to get to his automobile which was parked on the south side of the street, and when he had gotten two feet beyond the center line of the street he turned to see if his wife was following, and while in this position he was struck by defendant’s automobile which was proceeding westwardly.

There is a material variance between allegation and proof. Hall v. Poteat, 257 N.C. 458, 125 S.E. 2d 924; Bundy v. Belue, 253 N.C. 31, 116 S.E. 2d 200. Therefore the judgment of involuntary nonsuit is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff on 11 May 1962. Plaintiff assigns as error the granting of defendant’s motion for nonsuit at the close of plaintiff's evidence.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff “prepared to cross” a street in the City of Wilmington, he observed defendant’s automobile approaching from his left and “was afraid to proceed across the street, he came to a complete stop,” and while “waiting to cross” was struck and injured by defendant’s car. Plaintiff’s evidence tends to show that he was crossing the street in the middle of a block to get to his automobile which was parked on the south side of the street, and when he had gotten two feet beyond the center line of the street he turned to see if his wife was following, and while in this position he was struck by defendant’s automobile which was proceeding westwardly.

There is a material variance between allegation and proof. Hall v. Poteat, 257 N.C. 458, 125 S.E. 2d 924; Bundy v. Belue, 253 N.C. 31, 116 S.E. 2d 200. Therefore the judgment of involuntary nonsuit is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.E.2d 669, 261 N.C. 412, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canady-v-collins-nc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack