Canadian Indemnity Company v. K & T, Inc.

953 F.2d 1391, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9220
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 1992
Docket91-4039
StatusPublished

This text of 953 F.2d 1391 (Canadian Indemnity Company v. K & T, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canadian Indemnity Company v. K & T, Inc., 953 F.2d 1391, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9220 (10th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

953 F.2d 1391

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

CANADIAN INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Canadian corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
K & T, INC. d/b/a Budget Rent-A-Car of Salt Lake City, a
Utah corporation; and General Accident Insurance
Company, a Pennsylvania corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-4039.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 1992.

Before SEYMOUR and BARRETT, Circuit Judges, and BROWN,* District Judge.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT**

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Canadian Indemnity Company appeals from the district court's judgment dismissing this action as barred by the statute of limitations. We have carefully reviewed the arguments of plaintiff and the authorities on which it relies. We are not persuaded that the district court committed reversible error.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

*

Honorable Wesley E. Brown, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation

**

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
953 F.2d 1391, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canadian-indemnity-company-v-k-t-inc-ca10-1992.