Canada v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad

57 So. 913, 101 Miss. 274
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The contract sued on having been made by plaintiff’s wife with appellee for his (plaintiff’s) benefit, he has the right to maintain a suit for the-breach thereof in his own name. Sweatman v. Parker, 49 Miss. 19, 30 Cyc. 65; 15 Ency. Plead, and Prac. 509.

The allegation that the contract sued on was made with an agent of the defendant carries with it the inference that in making it the agent acted within the- scope of his authority. 31 Cyc. 1627; 16 Ency. Plead, and Prac. 900. Whether or not this agent in fact acted within the scope of his authority can therefore he determined only when the proof .comes in.

The demurrer should have been overruled, and consequently the judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Canada v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad, 57 So. 913, 101 Miss. 274 (Mich. 1911).

57 So. 913 (Canada v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burns v. Washington Savings & Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'n
171 So. 2d 322 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Hewes
199 So. 93 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)
Rentschler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
253 N.W. 694 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1934)
Garmon v. Fitzgerald
151 So. 726 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)
Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. Sideboard
133 So. 669 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1931)