Canada v. Ray

437 F. App'x 263
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6239
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 437 F. App'x 263 (Canada v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canada v. Ray, 437 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin A. Canada appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Canada v. Ray, No. 7:08-cv-00219, 2011 WL 565611 (W.D.Va. Feb. 9, 2011). We deny Canada’s motions to appoint counsel, to amend the record, and for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because [264]*264the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. Coyne-Fague
D. Rhode Island, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
437 F. App'x 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canada-v-ray-ca4-2011.