Canada v. Goode

890 So. 2d 974, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 326, 2004 WL 914644
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedApril 30, 2004
Docket2020038
StatusPublished

This text of 890 So. 2d 974 (Canada v. Goode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Canada v. Goode, 890 So. 2d 974, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 326, 2004 WL 914644 (Ala. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

This court, on July 3, 2003, affirmed the trial court’s judgment, without an opinion. Canada v. Goode (No. 2020038, July 3, 2003), — So.2d - (Ala.Civ.App.2003) (table). This court’s judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Canada, 890 So.2d 968 (Ala.2004). In compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for [975]*975further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

YATES, P.J., and CRAWLEY, THOMPSON, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Canada
890 So. 2d 968 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 974, 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 326, 2004 WL 914644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canada-v-goode-alacivapp-2004.