Canada v. Canada
This text of 256 S.E.2d 471 (Canada v. Canada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The parties in this action were divorced in June, 1977. Appellant, Robert Canada, was ordered to pay his former wife $300 per month as alimony and $200 per month as child support. In August, 1978, appellant filed a complaint for modification of those payments on the grounds that there had been a substantial change in the financial status of both parties since the time the final judgment was rendered. After a full hearing, the trial court reduced appellant’s alimony payments by $50 per month.
1. Appellant contends that Georgia’s alimony statutes are unconstitutional. This issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Kosikowski v. Kosikowski, 243 Ga. 413 (254 SE2d 363) (1979).
2. Our review of the evidence supports the trial court’s discretion in refusing to totally abrogate appellant’s alimony obligation. Trippe v. Trippe, 237 Ga. 159 (227 SE2d 46) (1976).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 S.E.2d 471, 243 Ga. 729, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/canada-v-canada-ga-1979.