Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 260, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1392
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Cust. Ct. 105 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 14, 1949·No. No. 52930; protests 115217-K, etc. (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
For the reasons stated in Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 260, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1392 (cusc 1949).
22 Cust. Ct. 260 (Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)