Can Am Investment Realty, Inc. v. Egan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Can Am Investment Realty, Inc. v. Egan

561 So. 2d 10, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1990 WL 58263

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 1990

DocketNo. 89-517

StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 10 (Can Am Investment Realty, Inc. v. Egan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Can Am Investment Realty, Inc. v. Egan, 561 So. 2d 10, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1990 WL 58263 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee concedes that, due to the ambiguity in the operative dates involved, the two counts of the Complaint which allege breach of contract were improperly dismissed. Accordingly, the dismissal of those two counts must be reversed, with those portions of the Complaint being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

In all other aspects, the actions of the trial court are affirmed.

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellee concedes that, due to the ambiguity in the operative dates involved, the two counts of the Complaint which allege breach of contract were improperly dismissed. Accordingly, the dismissal of those two counts must be reversed, with those portions of the Complaint being remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

In all other aspects, the actions of the trial court are affirmed.

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 So. 2d 10, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3128, 1990 WL 58263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/can-am-investment-realty-inc-v-egan-fladistctapp-1990.