Camps v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Camps v. State

763 So. 2d 1213, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6113, 2000 WL 650192

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-0213

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 763 So. 2d 1213 (Camps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Camps v. State, 763 So. 2d 1213, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6113, 2000 WL 650192 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging, inter alia, that he was not awarded the proper credit for time served. The trial court, treating appellant’s claim as though filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), granted the motion in part and denied in part. This appeal followed.

The documents attached to the trial court’s order indicate that appellant should have received a total of 191 days of jail credit in case number 96-3498-CFA; the trial court awarded 148 days. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either award the appropriate credit or attach documents clearly indicating that appellant is not entitled to the additional credit. The order of the trial court is affirmed in all other respects.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging, inter alia, that he was not awarded the proper credit for time served. The trial court, treating appellant’s claim as though filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), granted the motion in part and denied in part. This appeal followed.

The documents attached to the trial court’s order indicate that appellant should have received a total of 191 days of jail credit in case number 96-3498-CFA; the trial court awarded 148 days. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either award the appropriate credit or attach documents clearly indicating that appellant is not entitled to the additional credit. The order of the trial court is affirmed in all other respects.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 So. 2d 1213, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6113, 2000 WL 650192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/camps-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack