Campos v. Mukasey

263 F. App'x 577
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2008·No. No. 07-72964·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). This court previously determined the merits of petitioner’s case in Campos v. Gonzales, 218 Fed.Appx. 595, 596-97 (9th Cir.2007). This court granted the petition for review in part and remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) for further proceedings concerning petitioner’s voluntary departure status only. Id. Upon remand, the BIA granted petitioner voluntary departure consistent with this court’s decision. Id. Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campos v. Mukasey, 263 F. App'x 577 (9th Cir. 2008).

263 F. App'x 577 (Campos v. Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Campos v. Gonzales
218 F. App'x 595 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)