Campos v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

Campos v. Holder

320 F. App'x 607

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 25, 2009·No. No. 07-71822·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM.**

Nestor Tecuapetla Campos and Lorena Del Carmen Barrera Hinojosa, spouses and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than nine months after the BIA’s May 2, 2006 orders dismissing Petitioners’ appeals. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM.**

Nestor Tecuapetla Campos and Lorena Del Carmen Barrera Hinojosa, spouses and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than nine months after the BIA’s May 2, 2006 orders dismissing Petitioners’ appeals. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

Footnotes

Campos v. Holder, 320 F. App'x 607 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

320 F. App'x 607 (Campos v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related