Campos v. Holder
This text of 320 F. App'x 607 (Campos v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM.
Nestor Tecuapetla Campos and Lorena Del Carmen Barrera Hinojosa, spouses and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than nine months after the BIA’s May 2, 2006 orders dismissing Petitioners’ appeals. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campos-v-holder-ca9-2009.