Campoli v. Brenner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Campoli v. Brenner

261 A.D. 901, 25 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8027

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 901 (Campoli v. Brenner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campoli v. Brenner, 261 A.D. 901, 25 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8027 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Westchester County reversing a judgment of the Justice’s Court, Town of Bedford, in favor of plaintiff and ordering a new trial, reversed on the law and the facts, and judgment of the Justice’s Court affirmed, with costs to plaintiff [902]*902in this court and. in the County Court. The testimony on the trial, as appears from the return, the decision of the justice of the peace, and- the brief of respondent, warrant a finding that defendant’s dog, to the knowledge of defendant, had a propensity to fight with other dogs. Under such circumstances, defendant is liable for the killing of plaintiff’s dog by defendant’s dog. Witness Craighead was qualified to testify as an expert as to the value of plaintiff’s dog. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Westchester County reversing a judgment of the Justice’s Court, Town of Bedford, in favor of plaintiff and ordering a new trial, reversed on the law and the facts, and judgment of the Justice’s Court affirmed, with costs to plaintiff [902]*902in this court and. in the County Court. The testimony on the trial, as appears from the return, the decision of the justice of the peace, and- the brief of respondent, warrant a finding that defendant’s dog, to the knowledge of defendant, had a propensity to fight with other dogs. Under such circumstances, defendant is liable for the killing of plaintiff’s dog by defendant’s dog. Witness Craighead was qualified to testify as an expert as to the value of plaintiff’s dog. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 901, 25 N.Y.S.2d 200, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campoli-v-brenner-nyappdiv-1941.