Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co.

24 P. 746, 85 Cal. 218, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 900
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 2, 1890
DocketNo. 13606
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 P. 746 (Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co., 24 P. 746, 85 Cal. 218, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 900 (Cal. 1890).

Opinion

The Court.

The transcript in this cause was filed December 5, 1889, and the cause was placed on the Los Angeles calendar for April 14, 1890.

The appellant’s points were not filed until April 8th, twenty-six days after the time when, according to the rule of the court, they should have been filed. On the day the cause was set for hearing the respondent moved the court to affirm the judgment without considering the merits of the appeal, as a penalty upon the appellant for his failure to comply with the rule.

But the rule prescribes no such penalty, and is not understood to involve any, except that the court may, in its discretion, refuse the appellant the privilege of making an oral argument.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bridgeman v. Village of Hardwick
67 Vt. 653 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1895)
Caldwell v. Greely
5 Nev. 258 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1869)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 P. 746, 85 Cal. 218, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campodonico-v-oregon-improvement-co-cal-1890.