Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co.

California Supreme Court

Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co.

24 P. 746, 85 Cal. 218, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 900

California Supreme Court·Decided August 2, 1890·No. No. 13606·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Court.

The transcript in this cause was filed December 5, 1889, and the cause was placed on the Los Angeles calendar for April 14, 1890.

The appellant’s points were not filed until April 8th, twenty-six days after the time when, according to the rule of the court, they should have been filed. On the day the cause was set for hearing the respondent moved the court to affirm the judgment without considering the merits of the appeal, as a penalty upon the appellant for his failure to comply with the rule.

But the rule prescribes no such penalty, and is not understood to involve any, except that the court may, in its discretion, refuse the appellant the privilege of making an oral argument.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court.

The transcript in this cause was filed December 5, 1889, and the cause was placed on the Los Angeles calendar for April 14, 1890.

The appellant’s points were not filed until April 8th, twenty-six days after the time when, according to the rule of the court, they should have been filed. On the day the cause was set for hearing the respondent moved the court to affirm the judgment without considering the merits of the appeal, as a penalty upon the appellant for his failure to comply with the rule.

But the rule prescribes no such penalty, and is not understood to involve any, except that the court may, in its discretion, refuse the appellant the privilege of making an oral argument.

Motion denied.

Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co., 24 P. 746, 85 Cal. 218, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 900 (Cal. 1890).

Pincite

24 P. 746 (Campodonico v. Oregon Improvement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related