Campitelli v. Campitelli

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campitelli v. Campitelli. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 F. App'x 946
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2002·No. 02-1068·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1068

DIANA M. CAMPITELLI; JOHN ANDREW NOONAN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

EDWARD CAMPITELLI; PATRICK CAVANAUGH,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

REBECCA GILLIAM, Private Process Server for defendant Patrick Cavanaugh,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01- 3738-L)

Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Diana M. Campitelli, John Andrew Noonan, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing this

civil action for failure to state a federal cause of action. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. See Campitelli v. Campitelli, No. CA-01-3738-L (D.

Md. Dec. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campitelli v. Campitelli, (4th Cir. 2002).

Campitelli v. Campitelli (Campitelli v. Campitelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.