Campion v. Carl
This text of 324 P.2d 474 (Campion v. Carl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff and appellant brought action against defendant for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in an automobile accident. The defendant by his answer, among other things, pleaded that plaintiff for a valuable consideration had, sub[263]*263sequent to the accident, settled with the defendant and had thereby released and discharged him from any and all claims arising therefrom, praying for an order enjoining the plaintiff from proceeding further in the prosecution of her action for damages. Plaintiff filed a reply seeking a decree cancelling the release because of alleged fraud. By stipulation the issues raised by the answer and reply were heard by the court sitting in equity. Prom a decree favorable to the defendant and enjoining plaintiff in her law action, the plaintiff appeals.
Our examination of the record indicates no reversible error and we, therefore, affirm the decree.
Costs to neither party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
324 P.2d 474, 213 Or. 262, 1958 Ore. LEXIS 309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campion-v-carl-or-1958.