Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne v. , Jessen (Christopher), Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc. v. Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer Engineering & Technology, Inc
940 F.2d 1533
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 5, 1991·No. 89-56050·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne V.), Jessen (Christopher),
Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc.
v.
Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer
Engineering & Technology, Inc.
NOS. 89-56050, 89-56057
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
AUG 05, 1991
Appeal From: C.D.Cal.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne v. , Jessen (Christopher), Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc. v. Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer Engineering & Technology, Inc, 940 F.2d 1533 (9th Cir. 1991).
940 F.2d 1533 (Campen (Sally M.), Finn (Anne v. , Jessen (Christopher), Jett (Wayne), Developak, Inc. v. Hubert (Edwin G.), Greenamyer (Darryl G.), Greenamyer Engineering & Technology, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Untitled Case
D. Montana, 2026
Davidson v. Paige
D. Hawaii, 2021
Skatteforvaltningen v. The Goldstein Law Group PC 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
S.D. New York, 2021
Produce Pay, Inc. v. Agrosale, Inc.
S.D. Florida, 2021
Scd Rma, LLC v. Farsighted Enterprises, Inc.
591 F. Supp. 2d 1141 (D. Hawaii, 2008)
Brophy v. Sterling Engineered Products, Inc.
940 F.2d 1533 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)