Campe v. Meierdiercks

25 P. 419, 87 Cal. 290, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1134
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 1890
DocketNo. 12951
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 P. 419 (Campe v. Meierdiercks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campe v. Meierdiercks, 25 P. 419, 87 Cal. 290, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1134 (Cal. 1890).

Opinion

Thornton, J.

In this case the whole question is as to an issue of fact, which was determined by the court below in favor of plaintiff.

Whether the money sued for was a gift or not, part of it to the defendant, and a part of it to his daughter, depends on evidence in the cause. The evidence was on all material points conflicting. The court below decided that the money was not a gift, and rendered judgment for plaintiff.

It is no use to review the evidence, but as it was conflicting on the issue above mentioned, according to the long^establislied rule of this court, the decision of the court below will not be disturbed.

Judgment and order affirmed.

McFarland, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coffin v. Bradbury
35 P. 715 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 P. 419, 87 Cal. 290, 1890 Cal. LEXIS 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campe-v-meierdiercks-cal-1890.