Campbell's Executors v. Leach

3 N.C. 233
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1803·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*234 Taylor, Judge.

The endorsed bond was substituted for that portion of the original debt, the amount whereof it represents. Teach cannot.be made liable, but upon the terms o? the endorsement ; that is to say, not unless it be established, that Ellison was insolvent. A loss of the debt for any other cause will not subject him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell's Executors v. Leach, 3 N.C. 233 (N.C. Ct. App. 1803).

3 N.C. 233 (Campbell's Executors v. Leach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ripley v. . Armstrong
74 S.E. 961 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
In re the Will of Herring
152 N.C. 258 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)