Campbell v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Campbell v. United States

151 F.2d 605

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 12, 1945

DocketNo. 10002

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 151 F.2d 605 (Campbell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. United States, 151 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel; and it appearing that the appellant voluntarily consented to a search of his premises, and thus waived any claim that his constitutional rights were invaded, Waxman v. United States, 9 Cir., 12 F.2d 775, certiorari denied, 273 U.S. 716, 47 S.Ct. 108, 71 L.Ed. 855.

And no reversible error appearing in the record:

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed, for the reasons stated by the District Court in the colloquy on the motion to suppress testimony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel; and it appearing that the appellant voluntarily consented to a search of his premises, and thus waived any claim that his constitutional rights were invaded, Waxman v. United States, 9 Cir., 12 F.2d 775, certiorari denied, 273 U.S. 716, 47 S.Ct. 108, 71 L.Ed. 855.

And no reversible error appearing in the record:

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed, for the reasons stated by the District Court in the colloquy on the motion to suppress testimony.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 F.2d 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-united-states-ca6-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack