Campbell v. Tunnicliff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Campbell v. Tunnicliff

185 A.D. 506, 173 N.Y.S. 242, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7938

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1918

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 185 A.D. 506 (Campbell v. Tunnicliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Tunnicliff, 185 A.D. 506, 173 N.Y.S. 242, 1918 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam [Peter F. Campbell v. Tunnicliff]:

The judgment should be modified by .reversing the 9th finding of fact, and by striking out the 1st, 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th and 21st conclusions of law; and by striking out the provisions of the judgment adjudging that the power of attorney to the defendant and the agreement between him and the plaintiff, and any assignment by him of an interest thereunder, were void ab initio. As so modified the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Page and Merrell, JJ. Page, J., dissented.

Per Curiam [Thomas A. Campbell v. Tunnicliff]:

The judgment should be modified by reversing the 7th and 8th findings of fact and the 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th and 21st conclusions of law; and by striking out the provisions of the judgment adjudging that the power of attorney to the defendant and the agreement between him and the plaintiff, and any assignment by him of an interest thereunder, were void ab initio. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Page and Merrell, JJ.; Page, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI