Campbell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Campbell v. State

1920 OK CR 26, 186 P. 1099, 17 Okla. Crim. 703, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 30

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 7, 1920

DocketNo. A-3375.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 26 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. State, 1920 OK CR 26, 186 P. 1099, 17 Okla. Crim. 703, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 30 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Bud Campbell, was convicted in the county court of Love County on a charge of unlawfully com veying intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this' court on May 28. 191S. it petition in error with case-made. The proof aa the part of the state to support the charge is conclusive and un-eontroverted. No brief has been filed. AVhen the case was called for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. .The motion to affirm for the reason stated is sustained. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Bud Campbell, was convicted in the county court of Love County on a charge of unlawfully com veying intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 30 days. Prom the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this' court on May 28. 191S. it petition in error with case-made. The proof aa the part of the state to support the charge is conclusive and un-eontroverted. No brief has been filed. AVhen the case was called for final submission the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal. .The motion to affirm for the reason stated is sustained. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 26, 186 P. 1099, 17 Okla. Crim. 703, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.