Campbell v. State of Minnesota
This text of Campbell v. State of Minnesota (Campbell v. State of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Clifton Scott Campbell, Case No. 24-CV-1788 (NEB/DLM)
Petitioner,
v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION State of Minnesota,
Respondent.
The Court has received the August 20, 2025 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko. (ECF No. 21.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above- captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is ACCEPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 (ECF No. 1) is DENIED;
3. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
4. No certificate of appealability be issued. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: October 6, 2025 BY THE COURT:
s/Nancy E. Brasel Nancy E. Brasel United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Campbell v. State of Minnesota, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-of-minnesota-mnd-2025.