Home/New York Court of Appeals/Campbell v. State

Campbell v. State

300 N.E.2d 736, 32 N.Y.2d 952, 347 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1169
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 8, 1973
DocketClaim 48104
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 300 N.E.2d 736 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. State, 300 N.E.2d 736, 32 N.Y.2d 952, 347 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1169 (N.Y. 1973).

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The record establishes that the claimant was not a trespasser over the lands he traversed and that he had long enjoyed permissible access over such lands to reach the highway, the sole means of getting to and from his property. Since the State’s appropriation deprived him of that access, he was entitled to the consequential damages fixed below.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasek, Gabrielli, Jokes and Wachtler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fodera Enterprises v. State
275 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Board of Lucas County Commissioners v. Mockensturm
695 N.E.2d 15 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1997)
Donaloio v. State
99 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
MATTER OF OSSINING URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. Lord
458 N.E.2d 375 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. Lord
458 N.E.2d 375 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 N.E.2d 736, 32 N.Y.2d 952, 347 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-ny-1973.