Campbell v. State
300 N.E.2d 736, 32 N.Y.2d 952, 347 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1169
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The record establishes that the claimant was not a trespasser over the lands he traversed and that he had long enjoyed permissible access over such lands to reach the highway, the sole means of getting to and from his property. Since the State’s appropriation deprived him of that access, he was entitled to the consequential damages fixed below.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasek, Gabrielli, Jokes and Wachtler.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. State, 300 N.E.2d 736, 32 N.Y.2d 952, 347 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1169 (N.Y. 1973).
300 N.E.2d 736 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fodera Enterprises v. State
275 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Board of Lucas County Commissioners v. Mockensturm
695 N.E.2d 15 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1997)
Donaloio v. State
99 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
MATTER OF OSSINING URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. Lord
458 N.E.2d 375 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. Lord
458 N.E.2d 375 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)