Campbell v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Campbell v. State

265 So. 2d 360, 1972 Miss. LEXIS 1380

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 20, 1972

DocketNo. 46714

StatusPublished

This text of 265 So. 2d 360 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. State, 265 So. 2d 360, 1972 Miss. LEXIS 1380 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

BRADY, Justice:

We have read the record in this cause with great care and we have meticulously reviewed the briefs of counsel. Though numerous errors are assigned, there is but one basic issue upon which the determination of this case rests and that is whether or not the court erred in not sustaining the appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained by the search warrant. The affidavit for the search warrant sets forth facts sufficient to establish probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant, and the evidence obtained under the search warrant is sufficient to justify the conviction of the appellant. This determination is not in conflict with the standards announced in Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 89 S.Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1590, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964); Strode v. State, 231 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); and O’Bean v. State, 184 So.2d 635 (Miss.1966). Therefore, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Forrest County is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, C. J., and JONES, SMITH and SUGG, JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRADY, Justice:

We have read the record in this cause with great care and we have meticulously reviewed the briefs of counsel. Though numerous errors are assigned, there is but one basic issue upon which the determination of this case rests and that is whether or not the court erred in not sustaining the appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained by the search warrant. The affidavit for the search warrant sets forth facts sufficient to establish probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant, and the evidence obtained under the search warrant is sufficient to justify the conviction of the appellant. This determination is not in conflict with the standards announced in Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 89 S.Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1590, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964); Strode v. State, 231 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970); and O’Bean v. State, 184 So.2d 635 (Miss.1966). Therefore, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Forrest County is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, C. J., and JONES, SMITH and SUGG, JJ-, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 So. 2d 360, 1972 Miss. LEXIS 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-miss-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack