Campbell v. State

101 So. 3d 913, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20320, 2012 WL 5935974
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 580
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2012·No. No. 2D11-6092·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elijah Campbell appeals the order summarily denying as untimely his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We [914]*914affirm. See Barrios-Cruz v. State, 63 So.3d 868 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). As in Barrios-Cruz, 63 So.3d at 870, we hold that Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively in postconviction proceedings and we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance for review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v):

SHOULD THE RULING IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS?

Affirmed.

DAVIS, VTLLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 101 So. 3d 913, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20320, 2012 WL 5935974 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

101 So. 3d 913 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
Barrios-Cruz v. State
63 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)