Campbell v. State
Opinion
Larry Campbell, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion challenging the legality of his consecutive sentences for false imprisonment and sexual battery with slight force. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). The postcon-viction court concluded that the motion was procedurally barred. In light of our decision in Williams v. State, 685 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), we reverse with directions for the postconviction court to dispose of the motion on the merits or to attach documents demonstrating that Mr. Campbell’s consecutive sentences do not constitute a manifest injustice. See Brinson v. State, 995 So.2d 1047, 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
16 So. 3d 316 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.