Campbell v. State

16 So. 3d 316, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888, 2009 WL 2835208
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Campbell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 939 So. 2d 242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 2009·No. 2D09-906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Campbell, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion challenging the legality of his consecutive sentences for false imprisonment and sexual battery with slight force. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). The postcon-viction court concluded that the motion was procedurally barred. In light of our decision in Williams v. State, 685 So.2d 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), we reverse with directions for the postconviction court to dispose of the motion on the merits or to attach documents demonstrating that Mr. Campbell’s consecutive sentences do not constitute a manifest injustice. See Brinson v. State, 995 So.2d 1047, 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

FULMER, LaROSE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 16 So. 3d 316, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12888, 2009 WL 2835208 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

16 So. 3d 316 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brinson v. State
995 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Williams v. State
685 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)