Campbell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Campbell v. State

666 So. 2d 1017, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 379, 1996 WL 21678

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 1996

DocketNo. 94-4245

StatusPublished

This text of 666 So. 2d 1017 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. State, 666 So. 2d 1017, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 379, 1996 WL 21678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. Appellant contends the revocation order is deficient, in that it does not set forth the specific conditions of probation which appellant was found to have violated. We affirm the order revoking probation, but remand for amendment of the order to reflect the specific terms and conditions of probation violated. Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA1993).

BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation. Appellant contends the revocation order is deficient, in that it does not set forth the specific conditions of probation which appellant was found to have violated. We affirm the order revoking probation, but remand for amendment of the order to reflect the specific terms and conditions of probation violated. Cue v. State, 619 So.2d 471 (Fla. 1st DCA1993).

BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

666 So. 2d 1017, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 379, 1996 WL 21678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack