Campbell v. State ex rel. Cain

26 Ohio C.C. Dec. 171, 15 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 574, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 314
CourtHamilton Circuit Court
DecidedJune 3, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ohio C.C. Dec. 171 (Campbell v. State ex rel. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. State ex rel. Cain, 26 Ohio C.C. Dec. 171, 15 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 574, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 314 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1911).

Opinion

JONES. J.

The jury found the defendant below guilty as charged in the complaint after hearing the evidence adduced and proper instructions by the court.

[172]*172We think the failure of plaintiff below to read the transcript of complainant’s evidence, as given before the magistrate, at the proper time is not prejudicial error.

The transcript was referred to in the trial by counsel before plaintiff rested and it was within the discretion of the court to permit it to be read later, especially as it was read before defendant placed a witness on the stand.

The evidence is conflicting, as it always is in cases of this nature. The jury heard it with full opportunity to note the interest and demeanor of the witnesses and were the sole judges of the reliability and credibility of the testimony offered.

Finding no error the judgment will be affirmed.

Smith and Swing, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ohio C.C. Dec. 171, 15 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 574, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-ex-rel-cain-ohcircthamilton-1911.