Campbell v. State

58 So. 125, 4 Ala. App. 104, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 256
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 6, 1912·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

de GRAFFENRIED, J.

The indictment in this case charges that the defendant, “while intoxicated or drunk, did appear in a public place, to-wit a church, where one or more persons were present, and manifested his drunken condition by boisterous and indecent conduct or loud and profane discourse, against the peace and dignity of the state,” etc.

The defendant demurred to the indictment, because it did not allege at what specific church the defendant [105] appeared in a state of drunkenness or intoxication. The indictment follows the language of the form prescribed by the Code, and was not subject to the defendant’s demurrer.—Murrell v. State, 44 Ala. 367; Holly v. State, 54 Ala. 238; Fesson v. State, 26 Ala. 76; Elam v. State, 25 Ala. 52; 1 Mayfield’s Dig., p. 431, § 185.

The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the indictment. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. State, 58 So. 125, 4 Ala. App. 104, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 256 (Ala. Ct. App. 1912).

58 So. 125 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. Kitzen
9 Fla. Supp. 80 (Broward County Circuit Court, 1956)
The Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert
169 So. 750 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Sullivan Et Vir v. Thumm Et Ux.
136 So. 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Williams v. State
122 So. 460 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Hunter v. State
101 So. 100 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
Posey v. State
86 So. 117 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)
Oliver v. State
79 So. 313 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)