Campbell v. State

423 So. 2d 284
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedAugust 24, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 423 So. 2d 284 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. State, 423 So. 2d 284 (Ala. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

The defendant was indicted and convicted for murder. Alabama Code 1975, Section 13A-6-2. Sentence was thirty years' imprisonment.

I
The trial court's refusal of the defendant's written requested jury instructions numbers 10 and 13 was not properly objected to and preserved for review. Allen v. State,414 So.2d 989 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982), affirmed, 414 So.2d 993 (Ala.). See Rule 14, Temporary Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective July 16, 1982.

More importantly, a review of the court's oral charge convinces us that the requested charges were "substantially and fairly" given to the jury in the court's general charge. Section 12-16-13.

II
The defendant filed a special plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect under Section 13A-3-1. Although there was no evidence that the defendant had been involved in any repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct, the trial court charged the jury, under Section 13A-3-1 (b), that "the term mental disease or defect does not include an abnormality of the mind which is only manifested by the repeated criminal or other antisocial conduct of a person."

The giving of an abstract charge which asserts a correct legal proposition does not operate as reversible error "unless it appears that on account of the circumstances of the case and the character of the charge given it was calculated to prejudice." McPhearson v. State, 271 Ala. 533, 540,125 So.2d 709 (1961); Traywick v. State, 378 So.2d 1196 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979). Although the particular charge was unsupported by any evidence, the record fails to establish any possible prejudice to the defendant.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur. *Page 286

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrior v. State
728 So. 2d 691 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1998)
Sasser v. State
494 So. 2d 857 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Stephens v. State
512 So. 2d 782 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Toles v. State
484 So. 2d 512 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Wesley v. State
481 So. 2d 1155 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Fleming v. State
470 So. 2d 1343 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Lynn v. State
477 So. 2d 1365 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Henderson v. State
460 So. 2d 331 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Moore v. State
457 So. 2d 981 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Neal v. State
460 So. 2d 257 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Williams v. State
451 So. 2d 411 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 So. 2d 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-alacrimapp-1982.