Campbell v. State
46 Ala. 116
Opinion
B. E. SAEEOLD, J.
The appellant was convicted under an indictment for selling vinous or spirituous liquors without license. The prosecution was for a violation of section 3618 of the Bevised Code, which is not a revenue law, but one for the prevention of offenses against public morality and decency. It is not repealed by the revenue law of 1868. — Mulvey v. The State, 43 Ala. 316.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. State, 46 Ala. 116 (Ala. 1871).
46 Ala. 116 (Campbell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ulmer v. State
61 Ala. 208 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1878)
Martin v. State
59 Ala. 34 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Nicrosi v. State
52 Ala. 336 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)