Campbell v. St. George Catholic Church

Missouri Court of Appeals

Campbell v. St. George Catholic Church

877 S.W.2d 718, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 995, 1994 WL 270468

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 1994·No. No. 65012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal a summary judgment claiming: 1) the trial court erred in overruling their motion to file a first amended petition and 2) in granting summary judgment because there existed a genuine issue of material fact.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal a summary judgment claiming: 1) the trial court erred in overruling their motion to file a first amended petition and 2) in granting summary judgment because there existed a genuine issue of material fact.

We have read the briefs, reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Campbell v. St. George Catholic Church, 877 S.W.2d 718, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 995, 1994 WL 270468 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

877 S.W.2d 718 (Campbell v. St. George Catholic Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.