Campbell v. Southeast Mall

655 So. 2d 211, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5720, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1283
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 1995
DocketNo. 94-2121
StatusPublished

This text of 655 So. 2d 211 (Campbell v. Southeast Mall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Southeast Mall, 655 So. 2d 211, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5720, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ordie Campbell appeals the order denying his motion for relief from judgment. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing where, utilizing New Jersey law, the trial court should determine whether Campbell received pi’oper substitute service. See § 55.503(1), Fla.Stat. (1993); Jones v. Directors Guild of Am., Inc., 584 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); cf. Burtchaell v. Hoffman, 508 So.2d 738, 738-39 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Directors Guild of America, Inc.
584 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Burtchaell v. Hoffman
508 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
655 So. 2d 211, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5720, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-southeast-mall-fladistctapp-1995.