Campbell v. Southeast Mall
655 So. 2d 211, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5720, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1283
Opinion
Ordie Campbell appeals the order denying his motion for relief from judgment. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing where, utilizing New Jersey law, the trial court should determine whether Campbell received pi’oper substitute service. See § 55.503(1), Fla.Stat. (1993); Jones v. Directors Guild of Am., Inc., 584 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); cf. Burtchaell v. Hoffman, 508 So.2d 738, 738-39 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. Southeast Mall, 655 So. 2d 211, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5720, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1283 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
655 So. 2d 211 (Campbell v. Southeast Mall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. Directors Guild of America, Inc.
584 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Burtchaell v. Hoffman
508 So. 2d 738 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)