Campbell v. Smullen
125 A. 569, 96 N.J. Eq. 724, 11 Stock. 724, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 398
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Rosenberg. *Page 734 For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS — 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. Smullen, 125 A. 569, 96 N.J. Eq. 724, 11 Stock. 724, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 398 (N.J. 1924).
125 A. 569 (Campbell v. Smullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate Ehrlich
47 A.3d 12 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2012)
Crozier v. Doyle
232 N.W.2d 554 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1975)
In Re Estate of Crozier
232 N.W.2d 554 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1975)
In Re Lawrence
47 A.2d 322 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1946)
McTamney v. McTamney
46 A.2d 444 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)
Lowe v. Fickling
36 S.E.2d 293 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1945)
In Re Estate of Bernard Thomas
263 N.W. 891 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
Garibaldi B. L. v. Garibaldi League No. 1.
162 A. 419 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1932)
In Re Calef
156 A. 475 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1931)
In Re Schultz
133 A. 762 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1926)