Campbell v. Segars

81 Ala. 259
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 81 Ala. 259 (Campbell v. Segars) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Segars, 81 Ala. 259 (Ala. 1886).

Opinion

STONE C. J.

— The present action counts on a promissory note, bearing date February 9, 1884. The defense made to the action was, that the note was given in the purchase of a commercial fertilizer, known as Bahama Soluble Guano, “which guano had never been analyzed by the agricultural commissioner of the State of Alabama, nor neither bag, bar[261]*261rel or package thereof was tagged as required by the the 8th section of the act of the General Assembly, to establish a department of agriculture for the State of Alabama, approved February 23, 1883. — Sess. Acts, 1882-83, p. 190.” That statute denounces a heavy penalty against any person who sells or offers for sale in this State any lot or package of commercial fertilizer, without first complying with certain of its provisions, one of which is to procure an analysis of the fertilizer by the State agricultural commissioner. Another provision of the statute, for the violation of which a penalty is also denounced, requires that before any such fertilizer is sold, or offered for sale, there shall be attached to each package a tag, to be furnished by the agricultural commissioner, to be paid for by the dealer at a fixed rate per ton. The sale was made at Geneva in this State, and the plea, as we have seen, avers that neither of these statutory requirements had been complied with. There was a demurrer to this plea, which was overruled. The plaintiff then replied to the plea, the replication was demurred to, and the court sustained the demurrer. The Circuit Court did not err in either of these rulings. — 1 Brick. Dig. 377, §§ 34, 35; 3 Ib. 145 ; Woods v. Armstrong, 54 Ala. 150; Pacific Guano Co. v. Dawkins, 57 Ala. 115; Same v. Mullens, 66 Ala. 582; Clark v. Colbert, 67. Ala. 92.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Swank v. Moisan
166 P. 962 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)
Whitehead v. Coker
76 So. 484 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Florence Cotton Oil Co. v. Anglin
152 S.W. 295 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Merriman & Co. v. Knox
99 Ala. 93 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Johnson v. Hanover National Bank
88 Ala. 271 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Steiner & Sons v. Ray
84 Ala. 93 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Clark's Cove Guano Co. v. Dowling
85 Ala. 142 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Ala. 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-segars-ala-1886.