Campbell v. Ruttiger

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1996·No. 96-10025·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10025 Conference Calendar

GLENN C. CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RUTTIGER, Lt, Employee Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas; JOHN DOE, Employee, Clements Unit, Amarillo, Texas,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:93-CV-176 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Glenn C. Campbell, Texas state prisoner # 535319, appeals

the dismissal of his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(d). Campbell contends that Officer Ruttiger used

excessive force, violating his Eighth Amendment right against

cruel and unusual punishment. We have reviewed the record and

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10025 - 2 -

Campbell’s brief and AFFIRM the judgment. See Jackson v.

Culbertson, 984 F.2d 699, 700 (5th Cir. 1993). Campbell’s motion

for appointment of counsel is DENIED because Campbell’s appeal

does not present "exceptional circumstances" that would require

the appointment of counsel. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d

209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982).

AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Ruttiger, (5th Cir. 1996).

Campbell v. Ruttiger (Campbell v. Ruttiger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related