Campbell v. Rice
386 F.3d 1258, 2004 WL 2389433
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 2004
DocketNo. 99-17311,
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 386 F.3d 1258 (Campbell v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Campbell v. Rice, 386 F.3d 1258, 2004 WL 2389433 (9th Cir. 2004).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district, court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Rundle
180 P.3d 224 (California Supreme Court, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
386 F.3d 1258, 2004 WL 2389433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-rice-ca9-2004.