Campbell v. Read

69 U.S. 198, 17 L. Ed. 779, 2 Wall. 198, 1864 U.S. LEXIS 421
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 23, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 69 U.S. 198 (Campbell v. Read) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Read, 69 U.S. 198, 17 L. Ed. 779, 2 Wall. 198, 1864 U.S. LEXIS 421 (1865).

Opinion

At a subsequent day, the

CHIEF JUSTICE

announced briefly the court’s opinion, that independently of the record’s not showing a proper certificate, — this itself being a sufficient ground for dismissal, — the amount in controversy was insignificant, and that the court was satisfied, .on an inspection of the papers, that the allocatur was inadvertently *200 •sanctioned. There was, he said,, no principle involved of such extensive application as to bring the case within the act of Congress giving jurisdiction on a judge’s allocatur when the. amount in controversy is less than $1000. Notwithstanding the allocatur, therefore, the case was

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Chessman
218 P.2d 769 (California Supreme Court, 1950)
In Re Estate of Durham
191 S.E. 847 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 U.S. 198, 17 L. Ed. 779, 2 Wall. 198, 1864 U.S. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-read-scotus-1865.