Campbell v. Rapetti

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Campbell v. Rapetti

91 So. 3d 276, 2012 WL 2813881, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11281

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 11, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-2249

StatusPublished

This text of 91 So. 3d 276 (Campbell v. Rapetti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. Rapetti, 91 So. 3d 276, 2012 WL 2813881, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11281 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Campbell seeking a separate income deduction order or other enforcement to collect on the arrears set forth in the 2007 Utah judgment. Since the 2007 Utah judgment was registered in Florida, enforcement of the Utah judgment does not require a court to enter a Florida judgment establishing a cumulative arrear-age. § 55.604(5), Fla. Stat. (2012).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Campbell seeking a separate income deduction order or other enforcement to collect on the arrears set forth in the 2007 Utah judgment. Since the 2007 Utah judgment was registered in Florida, enforcement of the Utah judgment does not require a court to enter a Florida judgment establishing a cumulative arrear-age. § 55.604(5), Fla. Stat. (2012).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 So. 3d 276, 2012 WL 2813881, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-rapetti-fladistctapp-2012.