Campbell v. Pyms-Suchman Real Estate Co.
This text of 369 So. 2d 416 (Campbell v. Pyms-Suchman Real Estate Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contract in the instant case is somewhat different from the contract in Campbell v. Pace, 369 So.2d 413 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). However, it arose under similar situations to that in the cited case; the only material difference being that the brokers in the instant matter were to receive interest on their deferred brokerage commission, which was likewise payable out of the payments received by John W. Campbell on an installment basis.
We find no error in the summary judgment under review, and affirm on the authority of Campbell v. Pace, supra.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
369 So. 2d 416, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14708, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-pyms-suchman-real-estate-co-fladistctapp-1979.