Campbell v. Pullman Co.
182 A.D. 931
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Although it seems to us that the amount of the discomfort and inconvenience was small, we cannot say that nominal damages would be compensation therefor. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. Pullman Co., 182 A.D. 931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
182 A.D. 931 (Campbell v. Pullman Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dominianni v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
110 Misc. 2d 929 (Harrison Town Court, 1981)
Cohen v. Varig Airlines, S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense
85 Misc. 2d 653 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1975)
Odysseys Unlimited, Inc. v. Astral Travel Service
77 Misc. 2d 502 (New York Supreme Court, 1974)
Owens v. Italia Societa Per Azione Navigazione-Genova
70 Misc. 2d 719 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1972)
Brown v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.
16 Misc. 2d 692 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1959)
Davis v. New York Central Railroad
163 Misc. 710 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Killeen v. U. S. Lines Operations, Inc.
234 A.D. 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)