Campbell v. Nichols

234 P. 463, 133 Wash. 700, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1228
Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1925·No. No. 18655. En Banc.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

It appearing that notice of appeal herein had been given to the attorneys for the respondent receiver, but not to the plaintiffs in the original action, the appeal was ordered dismissed by Departmental opinion, Per Curiam, heretofore filed, and reported in 131 Wash. 1, 228 Pac. 833; and upon a rehearing En Banc, and upon a further examination of the record, a majority of the court adhere to that opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell v. Nichols, 234 P. 463, 133 Wash. 700, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1228 (Wash. 1925).

234 P. 463 (Campbell v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Studebaker v. Buckingham
240 P. 4 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)