Campbell v. Nichols

234 P. 463, 133 Wash. 700, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1228
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedApril 9, 1925
DocketNo. 18655. En Banc.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 234 P. 463 (Campbell v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell v. Nichols, 234 P. 463, 133 Wash. 700, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1228 (Wash. 1925).

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

It appearing that notice of appeal herein had been given to the attorneys for the respondent receiver, but not to the plaintiffs in the original action, the appeal was ordered dismissed by Departmental opinion, Per Curiam, heretofore filed, and reported in 131 Wash. 1, 228 Pac. 833; and upon a rehearing En Banc, and upon a further examination of the record, a majority of the court adhere to that opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Studebaker v. Buckingham
240 P. 4 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 P. 463, 133 Wash. 700, 1925 Wash. LEXIS 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-nichols-wash-1925.