Campbell. v. National Acoustics, Inc.

79 A.D.2d 912, 434 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9783

This text of 79 A.D.2d 912 (Campbell. v. National Acoustics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Campbell. v. National Acoustics, Inc., 79 A.D.2d 912, 434 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinions

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 5, 1980, which adjudged, after a jury trial, that the defendants, National Acoustics, Inc., and Narcisco Patterson were liable to the plaintiffs in the total sum of $220,42,5, unanimously reversed, on the law, and case remanded for a new trial, with costs to abide the event. The testimony at trial indicated that plaintiff Bernard Campbell was crossing Hempstead Avenue at the corner of Springfield Boulevard when he was struck by the subject vehicle. However, the record is silent as to whether plaintiff was inside or outside a marked or unmarked crosswalk at the time of the occurrence. The trial court presented a factual question to the jury as to whether the plaintiff was within a crosswalk at the time of impact. Since the trial court thus recognized the possibility that the jury might find that the plaintiff was not within a crosswalk, it should have charged section 42(a) of the traffic regulations (Echtermacht v Cohen, 24 AD2d 968). In addition, the trial court erred in refusing to mark in evidence National’s cost sheets for Beach Channel High School and the Pan American job site. These exhibits were relevant since they buttressed National’s other proof which tended to show that Patterson was not at those construction sites on the date of the occurrence. For these errors, a new trial must be ordered. We find no merit to the other points raised in the defendants’ brief. Of course, we do not reach the question of whether the damages were excessive. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Birns and Lupiano, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Echtermacht v. Cohen
24 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 A.D.2d 912, 434 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-national-acoustics-inc-nyappdiv-1981.