Campbell v. Muswim Pools, Inc.
This text of 147 A.D.2d 977 (Campbell v. Muswim Pools, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiffs decedent was fatally injured when he dove into the four-foot-deep above-ground swimming pool owned by defendants Capaldo. Decedent was an experienced swimmer who was familiar with the Capaldo pool when he was injured during a game of “sharks and minnows”. Special Term denied defendant Esther Williams Pools’ motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs cause of action alleging a design defect. Decedent dove either impulsively or deliberately into the Capaldo swimming pool. In either case, his conduct was the sole proximate cause of his injuries (see, Smith v Stark, 67 NY2d 693). Under the circumstances, defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see, Howard v Poseidon Pools, 72 NY2d 972; Smith v Stark, supra). Accordingly, we modify the order of Special Term by granting summary judgment to defendant Esther Williams Pools and dismissing the action against it. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
147 A.D.2d 977, 537 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-muswim-pools-inc-nyappdiv-1989.